BOMBSHELL New California Ruling: Millions of Gun Owners Now Criminals?!

California: making home invasions easier than ever.

In case you missed it, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just gave law-abiding gun owners a big, greasy middle finger—and upheld the ban on so-called “high-capacity” magazines. Not surprising—the 9th is the most leftist court in America. If you were a law-abiding gun owner with a magazine holding more than 10 rounds yesterday—congrats: today, you’re a criminal.

And no—it doesn’t matter if you bought them legally during “freedom week” in 2019. The grandfather clause is dead. Basically, the Second Amendment just got stomped on again by activist judges who think “shall not be infringed” was a typo. Now the state gets to tell us how many rounds we’re allowed to defend our lives with—while criminals ignore every word, and politicians surround themselves with armed guards we pay for. And guess what? They’re all carrying 30-round mags.

And just to be clear—there’s no evidence this stops crime. None. This isn’t about public safety. It’s about making you the casualty when the criminals kick in your door. Or worse—when the boys in black go full Red Dawn and start no-knocking to enforce the next government-engineered crisis. This is totally unconstitutional. There’s nothing in the Constitution limiting how much ammo you can carry in your rifle or handgun.

Our Founding Fathers literally just finished fighting a war against a tyrannical government that tried to disarm them. In 1775, British troops marched on Lexington and Concord to confiscate guns and powder. The colonists said “not today,” and fired the first shots of the Revolution—with the same guns the British came to take. So no—the Second Amendment wasn’t written for hunting. It was written to protect us from rogue governments taking away our rights—including the right to bear arms. Disarmament is always the first step when governments want to enslave their people—and we cannot let that happen again.

So what happened with the 9th Circuit this time? The full court ruled 7–4 to support the ban on magazines over ten rounds. This whole thing started back in 2023, when U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, appointed by George W. Bush—maybe the only good thing Bush ever did—struck down California’s magazine ban. Then California’s commie AG Rob Bonta filed an appeal… and here we are.

Benitez wrote: “There is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity. Detachable magazines solved a problem with historic firearms: running out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun. There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers. Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”

And that’s the point—law-abiding gun owners aren’t the problem. They never have been. But the government won’t admit that. In fact, they go out of their way to hide it. Because armed citizens are one of the best ways to prevent crime in this country. Let’s talk active shooters. The FBI wants you to believe armed citizens almost never stop them. And yet… from 2014 to 2022, good guys with guns stopped 157 active shooter incidents.

The FBI? About 20. Let that sink in. Civilians outperformed the federal government eight to one. And in places where people are actually allowed to carry? That number jumps to 60%. But you never hear about it—because they’re cooking the numbers to push gun control while pretending responsible gun owners don’t exist. Because this isn’t about safety. It’s about keeping us defenseless. It’s about crushing resistance. And history proves it.

1917—Lenin disarmed the Russian people, then slaughtered millions.
1933—Hitler used gun registration to disarm the Jews; we know how that turned out.
1938—Mao banned civilian gun ownership, then he killed 50 million people who couldn’t fight back.

See the pattern? Dictators disarm first—then dominate. This isn’t a conspiracy. It’s history. And we’re walking right into it. Tyrants love disarmed populations. And the U.S. government is no different. The only difference is that our Founders saw it coming. And if you think this is fear-mongering, consider this: Just last October, the Department of Defense gutted the Posse Comitatus Act—the law that prohibits using the military against U.S. citizens. They reissued a Cold War-era directive that now allows the Pentagon to act without presidential approval during “extraordinary emergencies.”

Not terrorist attacks.

Not natural disasters.

Civil unrest.

Political crisis.

What counts as “extraordinary”? You’ll find out when you’re zip-tied in your driveway.

And if that wasn’t enough, the IRS was caught building a database of conservative gun owners.

This isn’t a dystopian nightmare; this is America, today. To bring it full circle, this latest ruling in California is almost certainly heading to the Supreme Court. And even though half that bench is compromised—including Roberts—there’s still a shot we come out ahead. Because in the Bruen ruling back in 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that any gun law has to be grounded in the historical tradition of the Second Amendment—which this ban definitely isn’t. Still, there’s no guarantee they’ll take the case.

So as of now, for California gun owners it’s illegal to buy, import, or even possess magazines over 10 rounds. Even if you bought them legally. Bottom line: Our government doesn’t fear criminals. They fear you. So next time a thug kicks in your door and threatens your family, just remember: If you survive… California will fine or imprison you for defending yourself with a magazine that has more than 10 rounds.